here and there

Icon

scurrilous scribblins

then again, it’s still in beta…

Only morbid curiosity made me sign up for an invite to hulu.com, whose name just reeks of eau de corporate office desperation, but after having checked it out for a bit (I consider this “research” for school), I’m surprised to find myself more impressed than contemptuous. The site loads quickly, and it’s clean and well-formed. I’ve grown used to how cluttered YouTube’s gotten, but I much appreciate minimalist design.

The content offerings are good if you need to catch up on the latest episodes of shows like “House” and “The Office” (i.e., NBC/Universal and Fox shows). Like, I’m super happy to find “30 Rock” on there, and ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT!!!! They also have old shows, like Bob Newhart and Woody Woodpecker. I wish they’d provide more episodes, though, rather than a partial selection. Maybe that will happen later. Unless they make us pay for those, which they very well might.

Hulu uses Flash-based video, of course, but the quality is noticeably better than what you’d find on YouTube or on those Daily Show clips on Comedy Central’s site. The video quality on Hulu is similar to what you’d find on the godawful NBC TV website proper (though I haven’t tried their proprietary player, just on principle), but Hulu’s UI is way, way better. They seem to have put a lot of effort into making the video player work smoothly and look nice, too.

For instance, the “seek” function is actually functional! The cursor is precise and it works without a hitch, which is so rare. Streaming is smooth, unlike that stoopid NBC site (yes I’m bitter). Videos even resume where you left off, if you clicked to watch something else or went to another website. I know they’re tracking our every move on the site for datamining purposes, but that is a given, and at least they’re giving us something useful out of it.

Also, you can pop out videos to resize them however you want: no longer the tyranny of “bad,” “tiny,” or “awful, blocky, full-screen.” The best size, though, is the default as displayed on the web page.

There are also buttons for feedback, writing a review, rating the episode, and sharing, and even one for learning details about the clip you’re viewing, which, if the info is incorrect, you can fix via the “feedback” button. The menus work similarly to most of the other video-sharing sites.

The coolest part about sharing a video (or embedding one) is that you can select a short clip from the video, and the way to do it is awesomely easy and intuitive. I only wish you could see thumbnails of the start and end points or something, rather than having to guess and click “preview” to check, which gets annoying pretty fast. I’d embed a video but it doesn’t seem to work anywhere right now. Here’s a video I’ve linked to on my tumbleblog, since WordPress doesn’t allow embedding.

Below the video are comments and “related” videos. The site is very easy to explore, with very few annoying things about the menu and navigation (just because Amazon uses ginormous hover-based nav menus doesn’t mean it’s cool).

Also, it’s free. The episode of “Alfred Hitchcock Presents” (featuring an impossibly beautiful Robert Redford) is as free as the latest episode of “My Name is Earl.”

The biggest downside is (surprise!) the ads. They’re about what you’d expect, appearing during act breaks like regular commercials, but that doesn’t make them any less obnoxious. But since they’re there, I wish they’d have different ads during each break, rather than, like, the same screechy Saturn commercial all three times.

Still. I was ready to heap scorn on this venture, but I can’t. Lame name aside, I like!

update: omg what is with those INTRUSIVE ads that appear above the player menu and COVER UP THE VIDEO??? BAD, hulu, BAD!!!

Filed under: tv, video, web2.0

at the supermarket: katsuo udon

Here’s something new: a foreign-foods edition of this column. And it’s FSM-approved!

Katsuo Udon really deserves props, though. I’m pretty sure the name is supposed to sound Japanese (and the font used on the packaging suggests likewise), but the product seems to be of Korean origin. It’s available at several Korean supermarkets, that I know for certain; haven’t checked any Japanese markets.

Anyway, this udon is really well-made. The noodles offer a perfect balance between chewiness and suppleness, and the liquid soup base is flavorful without being overpowering. The dry seasoning packet is a joke, but they always are. If you chop up your own scallions/onions and drop in an egg when the noodles are done (but while the water’s still boiling) – mwah! Perfection itself.

Of course, such quality comes at a price, about $4.99 for a pack of two, last I checked. At the Korean market you can get a different pack of udon that comes with powered soup base (like ramen) for like, $.50 (0.36 euros) or something. So I consider Katsuo to be an occasional treat (i.e., I wait until my mommy buys it for me). But on days when you want something really hot, or just something soupy and noodly (but not instant ramen-y), this is really the way to go.

Filed under: food

wish i could be that kitteh

What a great way to spend the day

Filed under: Uncategorized

Christmas Wishlist

  1. A car.
  2. Just kidding! I already have one! Woohoo!

  3. A carton of Stephen Colbert’s Americone Dream from Ben & Jerry’s, which I still have not found in any grocery store I’ve visited. Why not, Westwood Whole Foods, why ever not?
  4. End to the writer’s strike so we can have TV again.
  5. As long as we are thinking big: Stephen Colbert.
  6. The long-rumored, possibly imminent, small-form MacBook Pro.
  7. A guinea pig (because I have no room to keep a pony).

Filed under: personal

can’t concentra

Ahh, the holidays.

I don’t know if it’s coincidence that all the holidays where you gorge yourself (with social impunity) occur during the winter, but I’ve been preparing for it this season like none before. You know, like, because when it’s winter it’s cold, and you want to fatten up before the hibernation period begins. Plus it’s all dark outside.

Anyway, I’ve already had two Thanksgiving-type meals, and am finding it difficult to concentrate on anything because my mind and soul now have to devote a lot of their resources to the process of digestion. Blergh.

Filed under: food

car love

It still makes me smile whenever I see another Yaris on the road. Not the half-size hatchback ones, but the ones like mine. They’re so cute!

Filed under: car

sorry about that

Finally disabled the Snap! Preview thing on this blog. How annoying was that?

To make up for it, I added a Twitter RSS feed. This means I can blog less, so everyone wins!

Filed under: meta

human metadata

Today in archiving school we talked about archives that are run by crazy collector types (there are no other kinds of collector types. Just kidding. Sorta).

The thing is, collectors collect because they are passionate (dit “crazy about”) the things they are collecting. This means that they amass not only a vast amount of physical material, but also exabytes worth of information about the material: they are usually going to be experts, through and through, in the field in which they are collecting, or at least experts about their collection. So like, they know lots about, say, films of a certain genre. And also things like, oh, what’s in the collection, why each item they have is important, what each item contains, where the item is, where the item came from, what the item is worth.

Also, many collectors tend to be protective of their collections, because they are valuable, if only in the eyes of their collector. This makes collectors kind of paranoid, that someone might want to take away their collection, or to steal valuable items from the collection. Or harm the collection in some way. They might feel similarly about the knowledge they have of their collection: if someone else knows about it, they might be in a position to take it away, right?

So. Collectors know a lot of stuff. But not all collectors are trained in *managing* these materials in any rational way. Why bother cataloging, when *they know* everything already? So their knowledge will end up being strictly proprietary; and even if the collector is okay about sharing info (many looooove talking about their stuff to others — bore-them-to-tears kind of love), it’s likely that he/she is still going to be the only person who has all the information there is to know, just because they’re the closest to the collection, and they might not have time to be cataloging or otherwise purging all the important metadata from their brains. Also, nobody else cares as much as them to find all this out, or so they may think.

So what happens when this person dies? Is all the knowledge going to go with them? Mightn’t this be somewhat detrimental with regard to what’s left?

Filed under: mias

Gorgeous!

I’m swamped with things to do (it’s midterm season) but I couldn’t resist the chance to finally see UCLA’s 35mm nitrate print (rumored to have been the producer’s very own) of “Casablanca” at school. One of the profs screens it for his undergrad intro to film class every year. Which means the film print gets worse and worse every year, since every time it goes through the projector it’ll likely get more scratches and dirt.

On the other hand, people like the prof (and Henri Langlois) believe prints should be shown as much as possible because that’s what they’re meant to do. Some may even believe that the prints need to be ‘aired’ out like that in a regular fashion.

Whatever the case, I figured I should watch it before it got to the point where they couldn’t show the nitrate print at all. So no regrets! Such a fine movie.

Filed under: movie

del.icio.us

RSS tumbled

Flickrd



More Photos

Archive

November 2007
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930