I’d definitely count myself among the Twitter-skeptics. I never could understand what the big deal was about an app whose only purpose was to broadcast what users (aka Twits) were doing from moment to moment. Twitter just seemed like the sad apex of the pyramid of shallow narcissism built atop the foundation made by blogging, Myspace, YouTube, and that “Time Magazine Person of the Year” business.
But Clive Thompson makes an interesting argument for how Twitter could be useful — it gives you a sense of social proprioception, he says, where all the little updates and mini-pings help you stay caught up with your friends even if you don’t actually hang out with them regularly.
I guess it means that even if you don’t IM or talk to someone or meet up with them for a long time, you can still keep in tune with the vicissitudes of their lives via their Twittercasts. And because it’s done on such a micro-scale (with continuous, fleeting RSS-style updates), you do it pretty much subconsciously, meaning it takes a lot less effort to keep in touch (sort of) with your friends.
So one problem with this pro argument is that it means you can get by on even less personal, one-on-one interaction with people (if you consider that a problem). On the other hand, it means that when you *do* actually hang out with someone, you don’t have to spend a lot of time getting “caught up” and repeating stories and things. It’s like, the new “I’ve been reading your blog”, but somehow more.
Also, somehow less. I mean, Twitter might be banal as hell (depending on who your friends are, I guess). But that almost makes it more intimate. I haven’t been using Twitter very much at all, but I can easily see Thompson’s point because I already get a similar sense of social proprioception with people from their Google Calendars, which show up with my own gCal. Sure, it’s mundane, but it’s still useful for knowing what people are up to. And I barely notice that I’m doing it, because I’m not reading their calendar entries on purpose, so much as I am absorbing the information they leave on their gCals as I check my own stuff to get through the day.
One way Twitter is different from other kinds of social networking is that the information you provide is not standardized. So you have more freedom, even if you are limited to 142 characters. As long as you’re succinct, you can broadcast whatever information you feel like broadcasting. So I don’t think I’m wrong about the narcissism, but in the end, Twitter might be end up being more useful than a MySpace page. (Of course, Facebook, with its status updates, has had a Twitter function built in for a long time now). Well, at least Twitter looks a lot better than MySpace.
Anyway, I like Thompson’s idea that this sort of thing could be really useful in the workplace, or rather, the virtual workplace. I’ll believe it when I see it. Until then, here is me, twittering like an idiot