April 29, 2007 • 10:08 pm
This is hilarious and awesome, and not just because my studies are directly related: I mean, read the opening to this article:
The question probably never occurred to viewers in the 1970s and 1980s, but suddenly it is highly relevant: exactly how much worthwhile entertainment content was there in shows like “Charlie’s Angels,” “T. J. Hooker,” and “Starsky and Hutch”?
The Sony Corporation and its production studio, Sony Pictures Television, which controls the rights to those and many other relics of a distant era of television, have come up with an answer to that question: three and a half to five minutes.
Sony’s (yeah, boo, moving on) trying to make money off of their aged holdings by repurposing them as ‘minisodes.’ It makes perfect sense in lots of ways, the very least of which is the horribly slow pace of old TV shows and the need to tighten it up for modern viewers (I think that book by that one guy…..Everything Bad is Good for You is totally right, and that human brains today are trained to be more sophisticated in the way they process information than they were even just a few decades ago).
Ok, I really have to include the end as well:
Sony is even making a mini-version of “Ricki Lake,” one of its syndicated talk shows. “It’s great,” Mr. Mosko said. “The people get introduced, there’s a big fight, then they come together, and cry and hug. You get everything in five minutes.”
Filed under: tv
April 25, 2007 • 10:13 pm
For some reason all three classes of mine had abnormally huge amounts of reading assigned for this week. For TV class this morning we had well over 200 pages to read. For the class I had yesterday it was in the neighborhood of 100. And for Restoration class tonight we had around 100 as well. I looked ahead to future weeks’ readings and thought, “Yay, I’ll have fewer than 100 pages to read each week from now on!” And then I cried.
[OMG someone please get me a decent ebook reader or something for...mother's day? My half-birthday in July? My quarter-birthday on the 29th? Really, though, someone please invent a super-duper PDF reader that is as nice and easy to read as paper. I hate these long-ass PDF articles! They're unpleasant enough to read as it is!]
Instead of reading, though, I spent my weekend frantically trying to get my stuff together for paper prospectuses that are due soon, talking to professors, finding films at the archive study center, scrambling to write a resume and cover letter, and entertaining Friend J, who suddenly flew into LA on what might loosely be called a business trip (her crazy boss was apologetic enough to give her a ticket to her hometown further north for the actual weekend, but she returned Monday to fly out of LAX back to NY that evening, and I dragged her around to 3 campus libraries just so I could get my other crap done. Sorry for being lame!).
Fortunately,the writing load is a lot less this quarter, because for one of my classes, the grade is based on an art/database group project. Then I have a 20-25 page paper for TV (which I might do on cooking shows or PBS), and a 15-pager for restoration and a film dossier of indeterminate length.
I feel bad for the second-years, though. There are only four of them now, because one dropped out to join the regular IS people. Next week is their comps, in which they have to answer like, 5 questions, writing around 10 pages of answers for each. Which sounds easy, but they get the questions on Friday, and the exam is due Monday. So I guess that’s something I can look forward to for next year.
Filed under: school
An alarming number of my flickr faves are photos of strangers’ pets and other Internet animals. However, I am pretty sure this was one of the main reasons why the World Wide Web was invented, so I don’t really have a problem with it.
As you will learn from the owner’s caption for this photo, this is a pic of a dog named Moxie. I love how his energy leaps off the screen the same way he does as he fetches a toy called Henrietta the New Sexy Chicken.
(I’m all too familiar with the practice of over-naming fake chickens, having once owned a Pez dispenser top in the shape of a chicken head, which my high school friend dubbed Eduardo the Great Lover and Valiant Vigilante Against Anti-Capitalism, or something like that. I confess, I’m not sure what inspires people to apply racy/anti-Marxist adjectives to anthropomorphized poultry, but find it a bit too disturbing to worry about right now.)
Anyway, the overall adorableness of the doggie and his enthusiastic leaping prompted me to add this pic to my faves.
Filed under: faves, flickr
April 11, 2007 • 10:03 pm
Kurt Vonnegut had a big impact on my adolescence. Me and about ninety gazillion other poeple. God bless you, Mr. Vonnegut. RIP. So it goes.
Filed under: book